Sort articles by: Date | Most Rates | Most Views | Comments | Alphabet

Masjid al-Aqsa & ignorance of Ahmad al-Hassan!

Author: Rasul on 11-08-2016, 19:38, Views: 439

1

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

 

السلام عليكم

 

In this article, we wish to expose the ignorance of fake Imam Ahmad al-Hassan regarding the location of Masjid al-Aqsa. We can read in the book of Ahmad al-Hassan "al-Jawab al-Monir" the following:

 


ما اتقصود من اتسجد اتراـ واتسجد القصى ؟

اتسجد اتراـ ىو الكعبة، واتسجد القصى ىو بيت الرب أو بيت التقرب أو القرباف أو
ىيكل سيلماف،وتي ىيكل سليماف؛ لف نب ا سليماف ىو الذي بناه

 

 

Question to Ahmad al-Hassan: What is meant / intended by al-Masjid al-Haram and al-Masjid al-Aqsa?


Answer by Ahmad al-Hassan: al-Masjid al-Haram is the Ka’ba, and al-Masjid al-Aqsa is the House of the Lord or the House to draw closeness [to Allah] or the Blessed Sacrament/Holy Communion or the Temple of Solomon (pbuh), and its name is the Temple of Solomon (pbuh), for the Prophet of Allah Solomon he is the one whom built it.

 

 

Note: As we can see, this fake Imam claims, that the Masjid al-Aqsa is in Jerusalem and, that it was built by Solomon (as). Which is in reality belief of ignorant ones, who don't take knowledge from Ahl al-Bayt (as). Now, let's see, what true Imams (as) say about the location of Masjid al-Aqsa:

 

 

_______________________

 

Anṣārī References:

Source: al-Jawab al-Monir by Ahmad al-Hassan, Volume 5, page 19,

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

Masjid al-Aqsa & ignorance of Ahmad al-Hassan!

 

Masjid al-Aqsa & ignorance of Ahmad al-Hassan!

 

 

 

 

 

 

عن سلام الحناط عن رجل عن أبي عبد الله عليه السلام قال: سألته عن المساجد التي لها الفضل فقال: المسجد الحرام ومسجد الرسول قلت: والمسجد الأقصى جعلت فداك؟ فقال: ذاك في السماء إليه اسري رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله فقلت: إن الناس يقولون: انه بيت المقدس؟ فقال: مسجد الكوفة أفضل منه

 

 

[...] from Salam al-Hannat from a man from Abu `Abdillah (as). He said: I asked him about the masajid which have superiority (or, virtue). So he said: The Masjid al-Haram and the Masjid of the Messenger. I said: And the Masjid al-Aqsa, may I be made your ransom? So he said: That is in Heaven, to it the Messenger of Allah (saw) did the night journey. So I said: Verily the people say that it is Bayt al-Maqdis (i.e. Jerusalem)? So he said: The Masjid of Kufa is superior to it.

 

_______________________

 

Shia References:

Source: Tafsir-al-Ayyashi by al-Ayyashi, Volume 2, page 302, Hadith # 13

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

Masjid al-Aqsa & ignorance of Ahmad al-Hassan!

Masjid al-Aqsa & ignorance of Ahmad al-Hassan!

 

 

قال فإنه حدثني خالد عن الحسن بن محبوب عن محمد بن يسار [سيار] عن مالك الأسدي عن إسماعيل الجعفي قال كنت في المسجد الحرام قاعدا و أبو جعفر ع في ناحية فرفع رأسه فنظر إلى السماء مرة و إلى الكعبة مرة ثم قال سُبْحانَ الَّذِي أَسْرى‏ بِعَبْدِهِ لَيْلًا مِنَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرامِ إِلَى الْمَسْجِدِ الْأَقْصَى و كرر ذلك ثلاث مرات ثم التفت إلي فقال أي شي‏ء يقولون أهل العراق في هذه الآية يا عراقي قلت يقولون أسرى به من المسجد الحرام إلى البيت المقدس فقال لا ليس كما يقولون، و لكنه أسرى به من هذه إلى هذه و أشار بيده إلى السماء و قال ما بينهما حرم،

 

 

"I was sitting in the mosque while Abu Ja`far (as) was in a corner of that mosque. He took a glance at the heaven and another glance at the Ka`bah and then said " Glory be to Him Who made His servant to go on a night from the Sacred Mosque to the al-Aqsa [farthest] mosque (17:1)". He repeated this three times and then turned towards me and said, "What do the people of Iraq say about this verse, O Iraqi? I answered, "They sayt that the Prophet, blessings and peace of Allah be upon him was taken from night journey from masjid al-haraam to bayt al-maqdis [i.e. Jerusalem]". Abu Ja`far (as) then said, "It is not as they say. But he was taken for a night journey from here to here", - Pointing to the heaven. And he added, "What is in between them is sacred."

 

 

_______________________

 

Shia References:

Source: Tafsir al-Qummi by ‘Alī ibn Ibrāhīm al-Qummī, Volume 2, page 243,

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

Masjid al-Aqsa & ignorance of Ahmad al-Hassan!

Masjid al-Aqsa & ignorance of Ahmad al-Hassan!

Category: Articles, Shia Islam, Researches, Ahl al-Bayt (as), Ahmad al-Hassan (la), Shia Reply:, Imamah, Shia ʿAqeedah, Caliphate, Fake Yamani

 

Shameless deception of Ahmad al-Hassan with Shia hadith!

Author: Rasul on 11-08-2016, 11:33, Views: 636

3

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

السلام عليكم

 

In this article, we wish to expose another decepton of Ahmad al-Hassan with Shia hadith. Since, there is no evidences for Ahmad al-Hassan, he has to create them by making new and false interpretation or by cutting the hadith, so that he can feed it into his narrative. Let's take a look at his claim:

 

وعن الإمام الباقر أنه قال: (... له - أي للقائم - اسمان اسم يخفى واسم يعلن، فأما الذي يخفى فأحمد، وأما الذي يعلن فمحمد) وأحمد هو اسم المهدي الأول ومحمد اسم الإمام المهدي كما تبين من وصية رسول االله

 

Ahmad al-Hassan writes: "Imam al-Baqir (as) said; For the Qaim are two names, one is hidden and the other is revealed. As for the one that is hidden it is Ahmad, and the one that is revealed is Muhammad."[1] - [Ahmad al-Hassan interpreting]: "And Ahmad is name of the 1st Mahdi, and Muhammad is name of Imam Mahdi, as shown in the Will of Messenger of Allah (swt)."

 

 

 

_______________________

 

Anṣārī References:

Source: al-Mutashabihat by Ahmad al-Hassan, Volume 4, page 45,

[1]Hadith from Kamal al-Deen of Sheikh al-Saduq.

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

Shameless deception of Ahmad al-Hassan with Shia hadith!

Shameless deception of Ahmad al-Hassan with Shia hadith!

 

 

 

I say: Dear reader, if we refer to the source of the hadith, then we will find, that Ahmad al-Hassan has cut out the main part of the hadith, which would expose his false interpretation. Let's see, what hadith says:

 

حدثنا علي بن أحمد بن موسى رضي الله عنه قال: حدثنا محمد بن أبي عبد الله الكوفي قال: حدثنا محمد بن إسماعيل البرمكي قال: حدثنا إسماعيل بن مالك، عز محمد بن سنان، عن أبي الجارود زياد بن المنذر، عن أبي جعفر محمد بن علي الباقر، عن أبيه، عن جده عليهم السلام قال: قال أمير المؤمنين عليه السلام - وهو على المنبر -: يخرج رجل من ولدي في آخر الزمان أبيض اللون، مشرب بالحمرة، مبدح البطن عريض الفخذين، عظيم مشاش المنكبين بظهره شامتان: شامة على لون جلده وشامة على شبه شامة النبي صلى الله عليه وآله، له اسمان: اسم يخفى واسم يعلن، فأما الذي يخفى فأحمد وأما الذي يعلن فمحمد، إذا هز رايته أضاء لها ما بين المشرق والمغرب، و وضع يده على رؤوس العباد فلا يبقى مؤمن إلا صار قلبه أشد من زبر الحديد، و أعطاه الله تعالى قوة أربعين رجلا، ولا يبقى ميت إلا دخلت عليه تلك الفرحة (في قلبه) وهو في قبره، وهم يتزاورون في قبورهم، ويتباشرون بقيام القائم صلوات الله عليه

 

[..] Imam Baqir (as) said: Amirul Momineen (a.s.) said from the pulpit: “A man [Rajul] from my descendants would appear in the last period of time. His complexion would be fair with a reddish hue and he would have a broad stomach, his thighs would be big. And his sides would be broad. He would have two moles, one skin colored and the other like the seal of prophethood of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.s.). He would have two names, one is confidential and the other, popular. His secret name is Ahmad and his known name is Muhammad. When he hoists and waves his flag he would illuminate the east and the west. He would stroke the heads of the people. Thus there would not remain any believer but that his heart would become as a strong as a mountain of steel and Allah, the Mighty and the High would give each of them the strength of forty men. And no corpse would remain but that the celebration of his reappearance would reach its grave as the believers in the grave also would see him in their graves and they would greet each other upon the reappearance of Qaim (as).”

 

Note: Imam Ali (as) uses the word Rajul [رجل], which is reference to a singel man, and not the word Rijal [رجال], which is reference to mulltiple man. Now, it is clear, why Ahmad al-Hassan has cut out the important parts of the hadith, it tottally exposes him and his false interpretation. The name A.h.m.a.d. is hidden name of the 12th Imam (as), and not the name of Ahmad al-Hassan.

 

 

 

_______________________

 

Shia References:

Source: Kamal al-Deen by Sheikh al-Saduq, Volume 2, page 592, Hadith # 17

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

Shameless deception of Ahmad al-Hassan with Shia hadith!

Shameless deception of Ahmad al-Hassan with Shia hadith!

 

Category: Articles, Shia Islam, Researches, Ahl al-Bayt (as), Ahmad al-Hassan (la), Shia Reply:, Imamah, Shia ʿAqeedah, Fake Yamani

 

Shocking Bid'ah (Innovation) of Ahmad al-Hassan!

Author: Rasul on 11-05-2015, 20:35, Views: 2907

75

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

 

السلام عليكم

 

One of Ahmad al-Hassan's innovations is with the Mut'a (i.e. temporary marriage), this ignorant man and his followers claims, that the period in temporary marriage can be minimum 6 months, otherwise it is invalid - haram, and one commits Zina! Not only that, but he and his followers claim, that the Imams of the Ahl al-Bayt (as) can change the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad (saw), this is indeed a great lie against the Imams of the Ahl al-Bayt (as)!

 

The truth is, that the Sunnah of the Prophet (saw) can not be changed, and his Halal is Halal and Haram is Haram till the day of the Judgment. So, let's expose this charlatan by refering his claims to Ahl al-Bayt (as)!

 

 

Let's examine:

  • The innovation of Ahmad al-Hassan with the period of the Mut'ah.
  • The Halal [lawful] ways of the Mut'ah marriage according to the Sunnah of the Prophet (saw). What did the Imams of the Ahl al-Bayt (as) say about the period of the Mut'ah?
  • There is no Sunnah after the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad (saw).
  • The Halal [lawful] of the Prophet Muhammad (saw) will remain lawful forever up to the Day of Judgment.

 

 

The innovation of Ahmad al-Hassan with the period of the Mut'ah.

 

فهو شرط في عقد الزواج المنقطع، ولو لم يذكره انعقد دائمًا. وتقدير الأجل إليهما، طال أو قصر، وأقله ستة أشهر. ولا بد أن يكون معينًا، محروسًا من الزيادة والنقصان. ولو عينا أج ً لا دون ستة أشهر بطل العقد، ولو كان من نية الزوج أن يهبها المدة قبل العقد بطل أيضًا. ولا يحصل فك رباط الزوجية بينهما إلا بانقضاء المدة، أو أن يهبها الزوج. وللزوج أن يعقد عليها مرة أخرى في العدة

 

Ahmad al-Hassan says: "[The period] it’s a condition for temporary marriage, and if it wasn’t mentioned in the contract then the contract is permanent. Assessing the period is up to them, whether it was a long period or a short one. Minimum period is 6 months. It must be assigned, and protected from increase or decrease. If they assess a period under six months then the contract is invalid."

 

 

_______________________

 

Anṣārī References:

Source: Sharai’ al-Islam by Ahmad al-Hassan, Volume 3, page 28,

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

Shocking Bid'ah (Innovation) of Ahmad al-Hassan!

Shocking Bid'ah (Innovation) of Ahmad al-Hassan!

 

 

The Halal [lawful] ways of the Mut'ah marriage according to the Sunnah of the Prophet (saw). What did the Imams of the Ahl al-Bayt (as) say about the period of the Mut'ah?

 

Chapter 294 - Permissible Time Length.

 

 

عدة من أصحابنا، عن سهل بن زياد، عن ابن محبوب، عن علي بن رئاب، عن عمر بن حنظلة، عن أبي عبد الله (عليه السلام) قال: يشارطها ما شاء من الأيام

 

A number of our people have narrated from Sahl ibn Ziyad from ibn Mahbub from ibn Ri’ab from ‘Umar ibn Hanzalah who has said the following: "Abu ‘Abd Allah, ‘Alayhi al-Salam, has said, ‘He can arrange for a mutual agreement with her for any number of days they want.’"

 

محمد بن يحيى، عن أحمد بن محمد، عن محمد بن إسماعيل، عن أبي الحسن الرضا (عليه السلام) قال: قلت له: الرجل يتزوج متعة سنة أو أقل أو أكثر، قال: إذا كان شيئا معلوما إلى أجل معلوم، قال: قلت: وتبين بغير طلاق، قال: نعم

 

Muhammad ibn Yahya has narrated from Ahmad ibn Muhammad from Muhammad ibn ‘Isma’il who has said the following: "In response to my question before al-Rida’, ‘Alayhi al-Salam, about the case of a man who marries in the manner of al-Mut‘ah for one year or less or more, he (the Imam) said, ‘It is permissible if it is a known matter for a known number of days.’ I then asked if it terminates without divorce. He (the Imam) said, ‘Yes, it terminates without divorce.’"

 

محمد بن يحيى، عن أحمد بن محمد، عن ابن فضال، عن ابن بكير، عن زرارة قال:
قلت له: هل يجوز أن يتمتع الرجل بالمرأة ساعة أو ساعتين؟ فقال: الساعة والساعتان لا يوقف على حدهما ولكن العرد والعردين واليوم واليومين والليلة وأشباه ذلك

 

Muhammad ibn Yahya has narrated from Ahmad ibn Muhammad from ibn Faddal from ibn Bukayr from Zurarah who has said the following: "Concerning my question before abu ‘Abd Allah, ‘Alayhi al-Salam, about the case of a man who marries a woman in the manner of al-Mut‘ah for Sa‘ah or Sa‘ahtayn (one or two hours in the sense of the word before the invention of time clock). He (the Imam) said, ‘Sa‘ah or Sa‘ahtayn are not definite, however, they can set it as once or twice going to bed or one or two days and nights or similar things.’"

 

محمد، عن أحمد بن محمد، عن محمد بن خالد، عن خلف بن حماد قال: أرسلت إلى أبي الحسن (عليه السلام): كم أدنى أجل المتعة هل يجوز أن يتمتع الرجل بشرط مرة واحدة؟
 قال: نعم

 

Muhammad has narrated from Ahmad ibn Muhammad from Muhammad ibn Khalid from Khalaf ibn Hammad who has said the following: "I once sent (a message) to abu al-Hassan, ‘Alayhi al-Salam, and asked, ‘How much is the minimum duration of time in al-Mut‘ah (advantageous marriage) and if it is permissible to set the time for only one time going to bed. He (the Imam) said, ‘Yes, it is permissible.’"

 

عدة من أصحابنا، عن سهل بن زياد، عن ابن فضال، عن القاسم بن محمد، عن رجل سماه قال: سألت أبا عبد الله (عليه السلام) عن الرجل يتزوج المرأة على عرد واحد، فقال: لا بأس ولكن إذا فرغ فليحول وجهه ولا ينظر

 

A number of our people have narrated from Sahl ibn Ziyad from ibn Faddal from al-Qasim ibn Muhammad from a man whom he mentioned who has said the following: "I once asked abu ‘Abd Allah, ‘Alayhi al-Salam, about the case of a man who married a woman (in the manner of al-Mut‘ah) for only once going to bed. He (the Imam) said, ‘It is permissible, however, when the specified time ends he must turn his face away and must not look.’"

 

 

_______________________

 

Shia References:

Source: Usūl al-Kāfī by Sheikh al-Kulaynī, Volume 5, page 277, Hadith # 1-2-3-4-5

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

Shocking Bid'ah (Innovation) of Ahmad al-Hassan!

Shocking Bid'ah (Innovation) of Ahmad al-Hassan!

 

 

 

There is no Sunnah after the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad (saw).

 

عن علي بن الحكم عن أبان الأحمري عن أبي بصير عن أبي جعفر عليه السلام عن النبي صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم قال: أيها الناس إنه لا نبي بعدي ولا سنة بعد سنتي، فمن ادعى بعد ذلك فدعواه وبدعته في النار فاقتلوه ومن اتبعه فإنه في النار

 

[...] Muhammad al-Baqir (as) narrated, that the Prophet Muhammad (saw) said: "O people, there is no Prophet after me, and after my Sunnah there is no Sunnah. The one who claimed it after me, the claimer and his innovation leds into the fire. [...]"

 

 

_______________________

 

Shia References:

Source: al-Faqīh by Sheikh al-Saduq, Volume 4, page 125, Hadith # 5370

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

Shocking Bid'ah (Innovation) of Ahmad al-Hassan!

Shocking Bid'ah (Innovation) of Ahmad al-Hassan!

 

 

 

The Halal [lawful] of the Prophet Muhammad (saw) will remain lawful forever up to the Day of Judgment.

 

علي بن إبراهيم، عن محمد بن عيسى بن عبيد، عن يونس، عن حريز عن زرارة قال: سألت أبا عبدالله (عليه السلام) عن الحلال والحرام فقال: حلال محمد حلال أبدا إلى يوم القيامة، وحرامه حرام أبدا إلى يوم القيامة، لا يكون غيره ولا يجيئ غيره، وقال: قال علي (عليه السلام): ما أحد ابتدع بدعة إلا ترك بها سنة

 

Ali ibn Ibrahim has narrated from Muhammad ibn ‘Isa ibn ‘Ubayd from Yunus from Hariz from Zurara who has said the following:

 

"Once I asked Imam abu ‘Abd Allah (as), about Halal [lawful] and Haram [unlawful] matters and he said,‘Whatever the Holy Prophet (saw), has made Halal [lawful] will remain lawful forever up to the Day of Judgment and whatever he has made unlawful will remain unlawful forever up to the Day of Judgment. There will be no one other than him and there will come no one other than him.’ He said that Imam Ali (as) has said, ‘No one has established any innovation (heresy) without abandoning an established noble tradition.’"

 

 

_______________________

 

Shia References:

Source: Mir’āt al-‘Uqūl by Allamah al-Majlisi, Volume 1, page 200, Hadith # 19

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

Shocking Bid'ah (Innovation) of Ahmad al-Hassan!

Shocking Bid'ah (Innovation) of Ahmad al-Hassan!

 

 

 

Conclusions:

 

A: The Halal [lawful] way of the Mut'ah marriage according to the Sunnah of the Prophet (saw) is not "minimum 6 months". You can make '1 days' or '1 time going to bed' Mut'ah marriage according to the Sunnah of the Prophet (saw)

B: Ahmad al-Hassan makes innovation to the period of the Mut'ah, and claims, that the minimum period is 6 months.

C: There is no Sunnah after the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad (saw). The Halal [lawful] of the Prophet Muhammad (saw) will remain lawful forever up to the Day of Judgment.

 

Therefore; Ahmad al-Hassan is not only a charlatan but also an innovator, who is going to hell.

 

 

 

 

Category: Articles, Shia Islam, Researches, Ahl al-Bayt (as), Ahmad al-Hassan (la), Shia ʿAqeedah, Ḥadīth, Fake Yamani

 

“Ahmad from Basrah” - Deception of Ahmad al-Hassan!

Author: Rasul on 27-02-2015, 19:18, Views: 4000

86

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

 

السلام عليكم

 

According to Ahmad al-Hassan's claims & false imaginations, he himself is the 1st companion of the 12th Imam (as), from the city 'Basrah'. In order to prove his claims, he quotes the following ahadith in his own book: ''al-Javab al-Munir''.

 

عن أمير المؤمنين (ع) في خبر طويل :… فقال (ع) ألا وان أولهم من البصرة وأخرهم من الأبدال

 

Hadith # 1: [...] from Amīr al-Mu'minīn [Ali] in a long narration: "[...] then he (as) said: "and indeed the first of them [i.e. the 313 companions] is from Basra, and the last of them is from Abdaal [...]."

 

عن الصادق (ع) في خبر طويل سمى به أصحاب القائم (ع):… ومن البصرة ……… احمد

 

Hadith # 2: [...] from Imam al-Ṣādiq (as), in a long narration, in which he names the companions of al-Qa’im [i.e. 12th Imam]: "[...] and from Basra [...] Ahmad [...]."

 

 

_______________________

 

Anṣārī References:

Source: al-Javab al-Munir by Ahmad al-Hassan, page 63,

[Note]: Ahmad al-Hassan has 'cut' this hadith in order to fool people, none of this hadith supports the claims made by Ahmad al-Hassan!

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

“Ahmad from Basrah” - Deception of Ahmad al-Hassan!

“Ahmad from Basrah” - Deception of Ahmad al-Hassan!

 

 

 

Let's examine:

  • Who are from Basrah in the Shia hadith used by Ahmad al-Hassan, did Ahmad al-Hassan 'cut' the hadith in order to deceive people?
  • Objection of the Ansar & the source [i.e. the book Bishārat al-Islām] used by Ahmad al-Hassan. What has been mentioned by the author al-Kāẓimī?
  • What has been mentioned in the original source?
  • What has been mentioned in the secondary source?
  • What has been mentioned in the modern source?

 

 

 

Who are from Basrah in the Shia hadith used by Ahmad al-Hassan, did Ahmad al-Hassan 'cut' the hadith in order to deceive people?

 

ألا وأنّ أوّلهم من البصرة وآخرهم من الأبدال ٬ فأما الّذين من البصر ة: فعل ومحارب

 

Hadith # 1, what it really says: [...] from Amīr al-Mu'minīn [Ali]: "[...] then he (as) said: "and indeed the first of them [i.e. the 313 companions] is from Basra, and the last of them is from Abdaal, as for those from Basra they are: Al and Muharib."

 

وبالاسناد الأول: أن الصادق (عليه السلام) سمى أصحاب القائم (عليه السلام) لأبي بصير فيما بعد، فقال (عليه السلام): ومن البصرة: عبد الرحمن بن الأعطف بن سعد، وأحمد بن مليح، وحماد بن جابر

 

Hadith # 2, what it really says: [...] from Imam al-Ṣādiq (as): "[...] and from Basra: Abdurrahman bin Atıf bin Sad, Ahmed bin Melih and Hammad bin Cabir."

 

 

_______________________

 

Shia References:

Source: Bishārat al-Islām by al-Kāẓimī, page 295 & 298,

[Note]: In this edition of Bishārat al-Islām the hadith # 2 contains mistake, it says: 'وأحمد ومليح' so, I have used the original source.

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

“Ahmad from Basrah” - Deception of Ahmad al-Hassan!

“Ahmad from Basrah” - Deception of Ahmad al-Hassan!

“Ahmad from Basrah” - Deception of Ahmad al-Hassan!

 

 

 

Objection of the Ansar & the source [i.e. the book Bishārat al-Islām] used by Ahmad al-Hassan. What has been mentioned by the author al-Kāẓimī?

 

Objection: In [some] editions of the book Bishārat al-Islām, it doesnt say "Ahmed bin Melih" rather it says ''Ahmed, Melih"

 

Ansawer: Bishārat al-Islām is not the original source of the hadith, the original source is Dala'il al-Imamah of Ṭabarī al-Imami (ra), and in it, we can read: "Ahmed bin Melih". Seconldy, the author has made it clear that he has used the copy with mistakes:

 

هذه النُسخة كثيرة الغْلط ٬ وقد سقط منها بعضُ الحروف وبدّل البعضُ

 

al-Kāẓimī says: "There are many mistakes in this copy [i.e. the copy used by the author al-Kāẓimī]. Some of the letters have fallen. Some of the [letters] have changed."

 

 

_______________________

 

Shia References:

Source: Bishārat al-Islām by al-Kāẓimī, page 296,

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)
“Ahmad from Basrah” - Deception of Ahmad al-Hassan!

 

 

 

What has been mentioned in the original source?

 

وبالاسناد الأول: أن الصادق (عليه السلام) سمى أصحاب القائم (عليه السلام) لأبي بصير فيما بعد، فقال (عليه السلام): ومن البصرة: عبد الرحمن بن الأعطف بن سعد، وأحمد بن مليح، وحماد بن جابر

 

Original source: [...] from Imam al-Ṣādiq (as): "[...] and from Basra: Abdurrahman bin Atıf bin Sad, Ahmed bin Melih and Hammad bin Cabir."

 

 

_______________________

 

Shia References:

Source: Dala'il al-Imamah by Ṭabarī al-Imami, page 574,

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

“Ahmad from Basrah” - Deception of Ahmad al-Hassan!
“Ahmad from Basrah” - Deception of Ahmad al-Hassan!

 

 

 

What has been mentioned in the secondary source?

 

وبالاسناد الأول: أن الصادق (عليه السلام) سمى أصحاب القائم (عليه السلام) لأبي بصير فيما بعد، فقال (عليه السلام): ومن البصرة: عبد الرحمن بن الأعطف بن سعد، وأحمد بن مليح، وحماد بن جابر

 

Secondary source: [...] from Imam al-Ṣādiq (as): "[...] and from Basra: Abdurrahman bin Atıf bin Sad, Ahmed bin Melih and Hammad bin Cabir."

 

 

_______________________

 

Shia References:

Source: al-Maḥajjah by Baḥrānī, page 45,

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

“Ahmad from Basrah” - Deception of Ahmad al-Hassan!

“Ahmad from Basrah” - Deception of Ahmad al-Hassan!

 

 

 

What has been mentioned in the modern source?

 

وبالاسناد الأول: أن الصادق (عليه السلام) سمى أصحاب القائم (عليه السلام) لأبي بصير فيما بعد، فقال (عليه السلام): ومن البصرة: عبد الرحمن بن الأعطف بن سعد، وأحمد بن مليح، وحماد بن جابر

 

Modern source: [...] from Imam al-Ṣādiq: "[...] and from Basra: Abdurrahman bin Atıf bin Sad, Ahmed bin Melih and Hammad bin Cabir."

 

 

_______________________

 

Shia References:

Source: Mu‘jam aḥādīth al-Imām al-Mahdī by Sheikh Kūrānī, Volume 5, page 273-274,

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

“Ahmad from Basrah” - Deception of Ahmad al-Hassan!

“Ahmad from Basrah” - Deception of Ahmad al-Hassan!

“Ahmad from Basrah” - Deception of Ahmad al-Hassan!

 

 

Conclusions:

  1. Ahmad al-Hassan is a charlatan, who cuts the hadith, in order to deceive people.
  2. Ahmad al-Hassan is ignorant of the fact, that the hadith talks about 'Ahmed bin Melih'.

 

 

 

 

Category: Articles, Shia Islam, Researches, Ahl al-Bayt (as), Ahmad al-Hassan (la), Imamah, Shia ʿAqeedah, Ḥadīth, Fake Yamani

 

Ahmad al-Hassan fails due to ignorance! - Shocking!

Author: Rasul on 11-01-2015, 17:55, Views: 8823

70

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

 

السلام عليكم

 

The following arguments, has been used by Ahmad al-Hassan in his book: ''The thirteenth disciple'', in order to refute Sheikh Tusi's (ra) interpretation.

 

ثم من هم الذين يعتقدون بأ ن الإمام المهدي محمد بن الحسن ميت في زمن الظهور كما صرح الشيخ الطوسي ويعتقد أكثر الناس أنه بلي عظامه؟!! فالشيعة يعتقدون بحياته والسنة لا يعتقدون بوجوده أصلا فكيف يعتقدون بموته

 

[Ahmad al-Hassan says]: ''Moreover, who are those who believe that Imam al-Mahdi, Muhammad bin al-Hassan, is dead in the "Age of Appearance" as Sheikh al-Tousi stated, "And most of the people believe that his bones have deteriorated"?!! For the Shia believe that he is alive and the Sunnis do not believe that he is present in the first place so how can they believe in his death?!!!''

 

 

_______________________

 

Anṣārī References:

Source: al-Hawwari al-Thalith Ashar by Ahmad al-Hassan, page 141,

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

Ahmad al-Hassan fails due to ignorance! - Shocking!

Ahmad al-Hassan fails due to ignorance! - Shocking!

 

 

 

Claims made by Ahmad al-Hassan:

  1. Shia believe that he [i.e. 12th Imam (as)] is alive.
  2. Sunnis do not believe, that he [i.e. 12th Imam (as)] is present.

 

Questions asked by Ahmad al-Hassan:

  1. So, how can they [i.e. Sunnis & Shiites] believe in his death?
  2. Who are those who believe that Imam al-Mahdi, Muhammad bin al-Hassan, is dead in the "Age of Appearance"?

 

 

I say: In defence of Sheikh Tusi (ra) statement, ''And most of the people believe that his bones have deteriorated." The statement of Sheikh Tusi (ra) is about Shiites, who made such claims due to prolongation of the occultation, because of their ignorance. They were refuted later on.

 

In the book by Abdulaziz Abdulhussein Sachedina: ''Islamic Messianism: The Idea of Mahdi in Twelver Shi'ism, page 84, we can read the following: ''The occultation was already considered as tawil when Ibn Babuya composed his Kamal al-Din. In one place he relates his meeting with a man in Baghdad who complained to him that the ghayba had become prolonged and unbearable confusion had caused many Shi'ites to turn away from the Imamate of the Twelfth Imam because of the long occultation."

 

Also, when we refer to the Kitāb al-G̲h̲ayba of Sheikh al-Tusi, we can read the following, which supports our statement:

 

قال: وروى أحمد بن الحارث، رفعه إلى أبي عبد الله عليه السلام أنه قال: لو قد يقوم القائم لقال الناس: أنى يكون هذا وبليت عظامه

 

[Fii Nusrat al-Waqifa]: He said: Ahmad b. al-Harith narrated, going up to Abu `Abdillah (as) that he said: "When the Qa’im rises, the people will say: Is this the one, while his bones had decayed?"[1]

 

فإنما فيه: أن قوما يقولون: إنه بليت عظامه لانهم ينكرون أن يبقى هذه المدة الطويلة. وقد إدعى قوم أن صاحب الزمان مات وغيبه الله فهذا رد عليهم

 

[Sheikh al-Tusi says]: "And in this, a community will say, "his bones had decayed" because they will doubt that he had remained for this long period. And a community has claimed that the Patron of the Age has died, and Allah has concealed him – so this is a refutation of them."

 

 

_______________________

 

Shia References:

Source: Kitāb al-G̲h̲ayba by Sheikh al-Tusi, page 59-60,

[1] It is a Waqifi hadith, explained by Sheikh al-Tusi (ra).

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

Ahmad al-Hassan fails due to ignorance! - Shocking!

Ahmad al-Hassan fails due to ignorance! - Shocking!

Ahmad al-Hassan fails due to ignorance! - Shocking!

 

 

I say: As for the statement of Ahmad al-Hassan: "Sunnis do not believe, that he [i.e. 12th Imam (as)] is present." - There are Sunnis who believe, that he [i.e. 12th Imam (as)] was present and that he (as) died. Let's see what Sunni Imam Shāh Abd al-Azīz Dehlavi says, in his book: ''al-Toḥfa al-ʼIthnā ʿAshariyya.''

 

In the introduction of his book, Imam Dehlavi says the following:

 

و این رساله را تیمّناً و تبرّکاً بهٔ عدد ائمه اثنا عشر علیهم السلام بر دوازده باب مرتب کرده شد

 

"And [the contents of] this treatise was sorted into twelve chapters seeking the blessings of the number of the twelve Imams, may Allah's peace be upon them."

 

Also, in the second chapter, he says:

 

تا آنکه نوبت حضرت امام محمد بن الحسن المهدی رسید و ایشان متولد شدند و در حالت طفولیت و صغر سن وفات کردند

 

"Till the turn [of the Imamate] reached Imam Mohammad bin al-Hassan, who was born and then passed away in his childhood."

 

 

_______________________

 

Sunni References:

Source: al-Toḥfa al-Ithnā ʿAshariyya by Imam Dehlavi, page 4 & 206,

 

 

(Click on the image below - in order to enlarge ;)

Ahmad al-Hassan fails due to ignorance! - Shocking!

Ahmad al-Hassan fails due to ignorance! - Shocking!

Ahmad al-Hassan fails due to ignorance! - Shocking!

 

 

 

Conclusions:

  1. Ahmad al-Hassan is ignorant of the fact, that many Shiites turned away from the Imamat of the 12th Imam (as) due to prolongation of the occultation, and claimed that the Patron of the Age (as) was dead, and that al-Tusi (ra) talks about them.
  2. Claims made by Ahmad al-Hassan are due to his ignorance.
  3. Questions asked by Ahmad al-Hassan are also due to his ignorance.
  4. There are Sunnis who believe, that he [i.e. 12th Imam (as)] was present and that he (as) died.

Category: Articles, Shia Islam, Researches, Ahl al-Bayt (as), Ahmad al-Hassan (la), Shia Reply:, Imamah, Shia ʿAqeedah, Īlm, Ḥadīth, Sharḥ | Explanation, History, Caliphate, Sunni Scholars, Fake Yamani

 
Previous Next